Center for Community Action & Environmental Justice v. BNSF Railway Co.

Good Law
764 F.3d 1019·2014 WL 4085860·44 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 20191·78 ERC (BNA) 2085·2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 16065
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 20, 201412-56086California5,432 words

Opinion

Opinion

Murguia, J.

In this case, we must decide whether the citizen-suit provision of the Solid Waste Disposal Act (Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA)), 42 U.S.C. §§ 6901 -6992k, may be used to enjoin the emission from Defendants’ railyards of particulate matter found in diesel exhaust. RCRA’s citizen-suit provision permits “any person” to sue the owner or operator of a solid waste treatment, storage, or disposal facility if the owner or operator “has contributed or ... is contributing to the past or present handling, storage, treatment, transportation, or disposal of any solid or hazardous waste which may present an imminent and substantial endangerment to health or the environment.” 42 U.S.C. § 6972 (a)(1)(B). We conclude that Defendants’ emission of diesel particulate matter does not constitute “disposal” of solid waste within the meaning of RCRA, and that Plaintiffs therefore cannot state a plausible claim for relief under § 6972(a)(1)(B). We therefore affirm the district court’s judgment.

I.

Union Pacific Railroad and Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railway Companies (collectively, “Defendants”) own and operate sixteen railyards in the State of California. On or near those…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.