Bode

Bode v. Los Angeles Doctors Hospital CA2/5

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaAugust 20, 2014B244502California5,397 words

Opinion

Opinion

Kriegler, J.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

Undisputed Facts

In 2002, the Hospital received conditional accreditation, in part because of inadequate monitoring of controlled substances. The Hospital implemented Sure-Med, which is a computer-operated drug dispensary system. To operate Sure-Med, a physician enters a password and other information to request drugs for a patient. After the patient’s procedure, the physician enters information about drugs used, returned to the Sure-Med system, or “wasted,” meaning disposed of in an authorized manner. A hospital staff member must witness and confirm the return of any drugs. The medication is deposited in a locked container in the machine and verified later. On January 1, 2003, Bode applied for membership on the Hospital’s medical staff. She began working as an anesthesiologist at the Hospital under temporary, but renewable, 90-day practice privileges pending action on her application. On January 21, 2003, the peer review subcommittee of the Hospital’s surgery department met to discuss documentation issues. The following day, chair of the surgery department, Dr. Dapo Popoola, sent Bode a letter listing six incidents concerning documentation: an…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.