Rodriguez-Rodriguez

Rodriguez-Rodriguez v. Holder

Good Law
584 F. App'x 593
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 20, 201408-70065California362 words

Opinion

Opinion

MEMORANDUM

Christian Ernesto Rodriguez-Rodriguez, a native and citizen of El Salvador, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying his application for asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252 . We review for substantial evidence factual findings. Zehatye v. Gonzales, 453 F.3d 1182, 1184-85 (9th Cir.2006). We deny in part and grant in part the petition for review, and we remand.

The agency denied Rodriguez-Rodriguez’s asylum application as time barred. Rodriguez-Rodriguez does not challenge this finding in his opening brief.

In denying Rodriguez-Rodriguez’s withholding of removal claim, the agency found Rodriguez-Rodriguez failed to establish a fear of future persecution on account of a protected ground. When the IJ and BIA issued their decisions in this case they did not have the benefit of this court’s decisions in Henriquez-Rivas v. Holder, 707 F.3d 1081 (9th Cir.2013) (en banc), Cordoba v. Holder, 726 F.3d 1106 (9th Cir.2013), and Pirir-Boc v. Holder, 750 F.3d 1077 (9th Cir.2014), or…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.