Scottsdale Indemnity Co. v. National Continental Insurance

Good Law
177 Cal. Rptr. 3d 648·2014 Cal. App. LEXIS 844·229 Cal. App. 4th 1166
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaAugust 20, 2014C071416California2,985 words

Opinion

Opinion

Raye, J.

In this insurance coverage action, plaintiff Scottsdale Indemnity Company (Scottsdale) and defendant National Continental Insurance Company (NCI) seek this court’s determination whether they are coprimary insurers or whether NCI is an excess insurer for an underlying fatality involving a tractor-trailer rig operated by Manuel S. Lainez. The trial court granted NCI’s motion for a summary judgment, concluding that Scottsdale was the primary insurer pursuant to California Insurance Code section 11580.9, subdivisions (d) and (h). We agree that Scottsdale is the primary insurer and NCI is the excess insurer and affirm the judgment.

FACTS

By January of 2007 Manuel Lainez had been independently driving commercial vehicles for eight and one-half years. He owned his own truck, also known as a power unit or tractor, and his own business, Lainez Trucking. He had his own motor carrier permit and operating authority in the State of California. He purchased a trucker’s liability policy from Scottsdale with a $1 million liability limit. The policy specifically described and rated a 1999 Freightliner tractor Lainez had purchased about three years earlier and expressly covered any…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.