Craig

Craig v. Saddle Ranch Chop House CA2/7

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaAugust 20, 2014B251014California5,098 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 8/20/14 Craig v. Saddle Ranch Chop House CA2/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION SEVEN

DEON CRAIG, B251014

Plaintiff and Appellant, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. EC058553) v.

SADDLE RANCH CHOP HOUSE, LLC,

Defendant and Respondent.

APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Samantha P. Jessner and Laura A. Matz, Judges. Affirmed. O’Neil & Matusek and Henry John Matusek II, for Plaintiff and Appellant Deon Craig. Collins Collins Muir + Stewart, Melinda W. Ebelhar and Edward J. Riffle for Defendant and Respondent, Saddle Ranch Chop House, LLC. _____________ Deon Craig appeals the trial court’s order granting the motion of Saddle Ranch Chop House, LLC, pursuant to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.