Bowers

Bowers v. Abercrombie & Fitch CA2/7

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaAugust 20, 2014B246196California3,079 words

Opinion

Opinion

Zelon, J.

Filed 8/20/14 Bowers v. Abercrombie & Fitch CA2/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION SEVEN

BENJAMINE BOWERS, B246196

Plaintiff and Appellant, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. BC486638) V.

ABERCROMBIE & FITCH CO., et al.,

Defendants and Respondents.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Mary H. Strobel, Judge. Affirmed. Law Offices of Zomber & Panagiotis and Matthew E. Panagiotis for Plaintiff and Appellant. No appearance for Respondent Brian Hilburn.

_______________________ Benjamine Bowers’s action was stayed by the trial court on the basis of forum non conveniens. Bowers appeals, and we affirm.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

Bowers filed a complaint alleging 14…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.