Udi

Udi v. Fein CA2/2

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaAugust 21, 2014B249321California5,686 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 8/21/14 Udi v. Fein et al. CA2/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION TWO

MEIR UDI, B249321

Plaintiff and Appellant, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. SC113746) v.

WILLIAM FEIN, YORI OLEYNIKOV,

and EYE SURGERY CENTER OF

BEVERLY HILLS,

Defendants and Respondents.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County. Norman P. Tarle, Judge. Dismissed in part; affirmed in part.

Meir Udi, in pro. per for Plaintiff and Appellant.

Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith LLP, Jeffry A. Miller, Arezoo Jamshidi and Howard Slavin for Defendants and Respondents William Fein and Yori Oleynikov.

Fonda & Fraser, LLP, John Aitelli and Daniel K. Dik for Defendant and Respondent Eye Surgery…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.