Vernon McNeal, Jr. v. J. Rush
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 21, 201412-17196California254 words
Opinion
Opinion
FILED
NOT FOR PUBLICATION AUG 21 2014
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
VERNON WAYNE McNEAL, JR., No. 12-17196
Plaintiff - Appellant, D.C. No. 5:11-cv-02798-EJD
v.
MEMORANDUM*
J. RUSH; O. SPENCER,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Edward J. Davila, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted August 13, 2014**
Before: SCHROEDER, THOMAS, and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges.
California state prisoner Vernon Wayne McNeal, Jr., appeals pro se from the
district court’s judgment dismissing for failure to exhaust administrative remedies
his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging Eighth Amendment claims. We have
jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo, Sapp v. Kimbrell, 623
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). F.3d 813, 821 (9th Cir. 2010), and we…