Hackin v. Lockwood

Good Law
361 F.2d 499
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 1, 196620446_1California3,447 words

Opinion

Opinion

361 F.2d 499 H. Samuel HACKIN, Appellant, v. Lorna E. LOCKWOOD, Jesse A. Udall, Charles C. Bernstein, Fred C. Struckmeyer, Jr., Ernest W. McFarland, Justices of the Supreme Court and the State Bar of Arizona, Appellees. No. 20446. United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit. May 20, 1966. Rehearing Denied July 1, 1966. H. Samuel Hackin, in pro. per. Mark Wilmer, Richard Mallery, Snell & Wilmer, Phoenix, Ariz., for appellees. Before BARNES and JERTBERG, Circuit Judges, and MATHES, Senior District Judge. BARNES, Circuit Judge: 1 This is an appeal from a final judgment of the United States District Court for the District of Arizona, granting appellees' motion to dismiss, and dismissing the cause of action and appellant's complaint and amended complaint as to all appellees. 2 The dismissal was "for the reasons stated in the Court's opinion of August 2, 1965." That opinion was not published and does not appear in the record before us. 3 Appellant, appearing in propria persona, is a graduate of a school of law not "provisionally or fully approved by the American Bar Association at the time of his graduation." 4 By subdivision 6 of Rule IV of the "Rules Pertaining to Admission of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.