Walker

Walker v. Citibank CA3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaAugust 22, 2014C072247California2,830 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 8/22/14 Walker v. Citibank CA3

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT

(Placer) ----

RICKIE LYNN WALKER, C072247

Plaintiff and Appellant, (Super. Ct. No. SCV0030536)

v.

CITIBANK, N.A., as Trustee, etc., et al.,

Defendants and Respondents.

After plaintiff Rickie Lynn Walker defaulted on his home loan, he sought to halt foreclosure proceedings initiated by a substitute trustee, contending the notice of default was void since defendants lack standing to foreclose. According to Walker, defendants are not the true beneficiaries under the deed of trust. Walker filed suit against

1 defendants, alleging fraud, quiet title, and violation of Business and Professions Code section 17200, and seeking declaratory relief.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.