People v. Deo CA3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaAugust 22, 2014C074334California650 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 8/22/14 P. v. Deo CA3

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT

(Sutter) ----

THE PEOPLE, C074334

Plaintiff and Respondent, (Super. Ct. No. CRF130699)

v.

RAJINDER SINGH DEO,

Defendant and Appellant.

A jury found defendant Rajinder Singh Deo guilty of inflicting corporal injury on his spouse. (Pen. Code, § 273.5.)1 At sentencing, the trial court sentenced defendant to prison but stayed execution of his sentence, placed him on five years’ formal probation, and (as relevant to this appeal) ordered defendant to pay (among other fines and fees) “a $70 court operations and conviction assessment.”

Undesignated statutory references are to the Penal Code.

1 On appeal, defendant contends the $70 “court…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.