Lovelace

Lovelace v. Pneumo Abex CA3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaAugust 22, 2014C072371MCalifornia3,994 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 8/22/14 Lovelace v. Pneumo Abex CA3

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT

(Sacramento) ----

MICHAEL LOVELACE,

Plaintiff and Respondent, C072371

v. (Super. Ct. No. 34201100104560CUASGDS)

PNEUMO ABEX LLC,

ORDER MODIFYING OPINION

Defendant and Appellant. AND DENYING PETITION

FOR REHEARING

[NO CHANGE IN JUDGMENT]

THE COURT:

The opinion filed July 25, 2014, in the above cause is modified in the following respects: Footnote 4 on page 12 is changed to read: Our conclusion the testimony provided by James and his expert witnesses constitutes sufficient evidence to support the judgment obviates the need to consider James’s contention the evidence can also be found sufficient…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.