Pedro

Pedro v. City of Los Angeles

Good Law
176 Cal. Rptr. 3d 777·2014 Cal. App. LEXIS 766·229 Cal. App. 4th 87
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaAugust 25, 2014B249005California2,914 words

Opinion

Opinion

Croskey, J.

The City of Los Angeles and Charles Beck (collectively the City) appeal a judgment granting a peremptory writ of mandate in favor of Jason Pedro, a police officer. Beck, as chief of police, charged Pedro with four counts of misconduct involving the use of a city police vehicle for personal business on two occasions, making a discourteous statement to a member of the public, and making a misleading statement to a supervisor conducting an official investigation. A board of rights found that three counts were barred by the statute of limitations. Beck expressed his disagreement, and the board later found Pedro guilty on all four counts and recommended a 22-day suspension without pay. Beck approved the recommendation. Pedro filed a petition for writ of administrative mandamus challenging the decision.

The trial court found in favor of Pedro on each count. It concluded that Beck had improperly directed the board of rights to find that the counts were not barred by the statute of limitations. Exercising its independent judgment, the court found that counts one and four were barred by the statute of limitations, and that counts two and three were not barred. It also concluded…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.