Yongsheng Han v. Eric Holder, Jr.

Good Law
584 F. App'x 677
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 25, 201412-72624California312 words

Opinion

Opinion

MEMORANDUM

Yongsheng Han, a native and citizen of China, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s decision denying his application for asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252 . We review for substantial •evidence the agency’s factual findings. Wakkary v. Holder, 558 F.3d 1049, 1056 (9th Cir.2009). We deny in part and grant in part the petition for review, and we remand.

Substantial evidence supports the agency’s denial of Han’s CAT claim because Han failed to establish it is more likely than not he would be tortured if returned to China. See Sinha v. Holder, 564 F.3d 1015, 1026 (9th Cir.2009).

Substantial evidence also supports the agency’s determination that Han failed to establish his experiences in China rose to the level of past persecution. See Gu v. Gonzales, 454 F.3d 1014, 1020-21 (9th Cir.2006) (record did not compel the finding that petitioner suffered past persecution). Substantial evidence, however, does not support the agency’s finding that Han failed to establish a nexus to a protected ground. See…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.