People v. Morales CA5

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaAugust 27, 2014F066557California1,397 words

Opinion

Opinion

FACTS

On June 9, 2009, members of the Modesto Narcotics Enforcement Team and the Modesto Police Department used a confidential informant to purchase a small quantity of heroin from Morales with a marked $20 bill. During a postarrest search of appellant, officers found syringes, methamphetamine pipes, and a bag containing wax bindles of a black tar substance. Morales admitted to the officers he was selling heroin. On January 10, 2013, the court sentenced Morales to an aggregate 13-year term, the upper term of four years doubled to eight years because of Morales’s strike convictions, and five one-year prior prison term enhancements. With respect to a drug program fee the court stated, “You are also required to pay a drug program fee [of] up to $150, depending on your ability to pay.” The court, however, did not actually order Morales to pay a drug program fee in any amount.

All further statutory references are to the Penal Code unless otherwise specified.

2 The court then imposed various fines and fees, in pertinent part stating, “... and I will impose $500 for the attorney’s fees for the Court-appointed attorney. [¶] In imposing all of these fees, I have carefully…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.