Rodman

Rodman v. Blake CA4/1

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaAugust 27, 2014D061434California13,211 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 8/27/14 Rodman v. Blake CA4/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION ONE

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

MICHAEL T. RODMAN, D061434

Plaintiff, Cross-defendant, and Appellant, (Super. Ct. No. 37-2008-00057170- v. CU-CO-NC)

SHARON BLAKE et al.,

Defendants, Cross-complainants, and Appellants.

APPEALS from a judgment and postjudgment orders of the Superior Court of

San Diego County, Earl H. Maas III, Judge. Judgment reversed in part with directions,

affirmed in part; postjudgment order affirmed; postjudgment order reversed with directions.

Wingert Grebing Brubaker & Juskie, Stephen C. Grebing and Deborah S. Dixon, for

Plaintiff, Cross-defendant, Respondent and Appellant Michael T. Rodman.

Mara C. Allard for Defendants,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.