Noonan
Noonan v. Bowen CA3
Opinion
Opinion
Filed 8/27/14 Noonan v. Bowen CA3
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED
California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT
(Sacramento) ----
EDWARD NOONAN et al., C071764
Plaintiffs and Appellants, (Super. Ct. No. 34201280001048CUWMGDS) v.
DEBRA BOWEN, as Secretary of State, etc., et al.,
Defendants and Respondents.
In Keyes v. Bowen (2010) 189 Cal.App.4th 647 (Keyes), this court held that the California Secretary of State “does not have a duty to investigate and determine whether a presidential candidate meets [the] eligibility requirements of the United States Constitution.” (Id. at p. 651-652.) Hardly a year after the Keyes decision, plaintiffs Edward C. Noonan and Pamela Barnett (among others) commenced this mandamus proceeding, seeking a writ of mandate to…