Parrish
Parrish v. Latham & Watkins
Opinion
Opinion
Filed 8/27/
CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION THREE
WILLIAM PARRISH et al., B244841
Plaintiffs and Appellants, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. BC482394) v.
LATHAM & WATKINS et al.,
Defendants and Respondents.
APPEAL from orders of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County,
James R. Dunn, Judge. Reversed.
Eagan Avenatti, Michael J. Avenatti and Scott H. Sims; Panish, Shea & Boyle,
Brian J. Panish, Adam K. Shea and Kevin R. Boyle; Esner, Chang & Boyer and
Stuart B. Esner for Plaintiffs and Appellants.
McKool Smith Hennigan, J. Michael Hennigan and Michael Swartz for
Defendants and Respondents.
_______________________________________ In a prior litigation, FLIR Systems, Inc. and Indigo Systems Corporation
(collectively, FLIR) brought suit against their former employees, William Parrish and
E. Timothy Fitzgibbons (collectively, Former Employees) for, among other things,
misappropriation of trade secrets (the underlying action). Former Employees were
successful in defeating the underlying action. Moreover, they obtained a ruling that…