People v. Ramos CA6

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaAugust 28, 2014H040452California502 words

Opinion

Opinion

Elia, J.

Facts and Proceedings Below1 On December 28, 2011, the Santa Clara County District Attorney filed a complaint in which defendant was charged with seven counts of forcible lewd conduct with a child (Pen. Code, § 288, subd. (b)(1), counts 1-7) and three counts of nonforcible lewd conduct. (Id., § 288, subd. (a), counts 8-10.) As to each count there was an allegation that defendant committed the offenses against multiple victims. (Id., § 667.61, subds. (b) & (e).) On July 10, 2012, defendant entered not guilty pleas to all charges. Subsequently, before defendant entered his no contest pleas, he executed an

1 The facts are taken from the probation officer’s report. 2 “ADVISEMENT OF RIGHTS, WAIVER AND PLEA FORM,” in which he was advised of and waived his constitutional rights to a jury trial, to present a defense, and to confront witnesses, and his right against self-incrimination. Defendant waived those rights.2 Defendant was advised that he would have to register as a sex offender, was advised of the immigration consequences of his plea, and was advised that his convictions on counts one, five, eight, and nine each qualified as a strike under the Three Strikes Law. (Id., §§ 667,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.