People v. Dambrose CA4/1

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaAugust 28, 2014D065208California4,828 words

Opinion

Opinion

Huffman, J.

FACTS

The Charges

The prosecution originally charged Dambrose with four counts: (1) counts 1 and

for obtaining a prescription by fraud/deceit (Health & Saf. Code, § 11173, subd. (a)); and

(2) counts 2 and 4 for forgery of a prescription for a narcotic (Health & Saf. Code,

§ 11368). Counts 1 and 2 concerned a prescription request on January 20, 2012. Counts

3 and 4 involved a prescription refill on November 26, 2011.

Subsequently, the prosecution filed an information consisting of three counts:

(1) obtaining a prescription by fraud/deceit (Health & Saf. Code, § 11173, subd. (a);

count 1); (2) forgery of a prescription for a narcotic (Health & Saf. Code, § 11368; count

2); and (3) attempting to dissuade a witness from reporting a crime (§ 136.1,

Statutory references are to the Penal Code unless otherwise specified. 2 subd. (b)(1)); count 3). These counts only concerned the January 20, 2012 prescription

request.

The case proceeded to trial.

Prosecution

On January 20, 2012, at about 5:00 p.m., Ricky Rodela went to Dependent's

Dental Center (DDC) for an emergency dental appointment because of an infected tooth.

Dambrose was the only dentist at DDC at…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.