United States v. Christopher Bradley
Opinion
Opinion
ORDER WITHDRAWING MEMORANDUM DISPOSITION AND DENYING PETITION FOR REHEARING AND SUGGESTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC
The memorandum disposition filed June 2, 2014 is withdrawn. A superseding memorandum disposition is being filed concurrently with this order.
With these amendments, the panel has unanimously voted to deny the petition for rehearing. Judge Wardlaw has voted to deny the petition for rehearing en banc, and Judges Noonan and Fisher have so recommended. The full court has been advised of the petition for rehearing en banc and no judge has requested a vote on whether to rehear the matter en banc. Fed. R.App. P. 35.
Defendant-Appellant’s petitions for rehearing and rehearing en banc are DENIED. No additional petitions for rehearing or rehearing en banc may be filed.
MEMORANDUM
Christopher Bradley appeals his sentence for conspiracy to distribute and possess with intent to distribute oxycodone and oxymorphone. We affirm.
The district court did not clearly err in attributing the entire amount of oxycodone found at his coconspirators’ stash house to Bradley for purposes of determining his offense level. See United States v. Palafox-Mazon, 198 F.3d 1182, 1184, 1186 (9th…