Fanuk Human Resources v. Cash Flow V CA2/3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaAugust 28, 2014B245415California5,630 words

Opinion

Opinion

Aldrich, J.

Filed 8/28/14 Fanuk Human Resources v. Cash Flow V CA2/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION THREE

FANUK HUMAN RESOURCES, INC., B245415 consolidated with

B247581

Plaintiff and Appellant, (Los Angeles County v. Super. Ct. No. BC436621)

CASH FLOW V, LLC et al.,

Defendants and Respondents.

APPEAL from a judgment and postjudgment order of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, John L. Segal and Joseph R. Kalin, Judges. Reversed in part and dismissed in part. The David Firm, Henry S. David and Dana J. Emmer for Plaintiff and Appellant. Wesierski & Zurek, Joseph E. DuBois, Mary H. Kim and Ashley A. Regan for Defendants and Respondents. _________________________ Investors of an…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.