Bardack

Bardack v. Tomjanovich CA2/8

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaAugust 29, 2014B247887California4,107 words

Opinion

Opinion

Grimes, J.

Filed 8/29/14 Bardack v. Tomjanovich CA2/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION EIGHT

STEVEN BARDACK, B247887

Plaintiff, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. SC101085) v.

RUDY TOMJANOVICH et al.,

Defendants, Cross-complainants and Appellants;

COLDWELL BANKER RESIDENTIAL

BROKERAGE COMPANY,

Cross-defendant and Respondent.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County. J. Stephen Czuleger, Judge. Affirmed. Daniels, Fine, Israel, Schonbuch & Lebovits, Mark R. Israel and Maureen M. Michail for Defendants, Cross-complainants and Appellants. Obrand Law Group, Michael F. Obrand and Jesse D. Obrand for Cross-defendant and Respondent. June Babiracki Barlow and Neil…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.