People v. Tablas CA4/1

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaAugust 29, 2014D065026California133 words

Opinion

Benke, J.

DISCUSSION

Appointed appellate counsel has filed a brief summarizing the proceedings below.

Counsel presents no argument for reversal, but asks this court to review the record for

error as mandated by People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436 (Wende). Pursuant to

Anders v. California (1967) 386 U.S. 738 (Anders) counsel mentions as a possible but not

arguable issue whether the court abused its discretion by denying the withdrawal motion.

We granted Tablas permission to file a brief on his own behalf. He has not

responded. A review of the record pursuant to Wende, supra, 25 Cal.3d 436 and Anders,

supra, 386 U.S. 738, including the possible issue listed pursuant to Anders, has disclosed

no reasonably arguable appellate issues. Tablas has been competently represented by

counsel on this appeal.

DISPOSITION

The judgment is affirmed.

BENKE, J.

WE CONCUR:

MCCONNELL, P. J.

IRION, J.

2