Barnum
Barnum v. Redlands Muffler and Brake CA4/2
Opinion
Opinion
I. INTRODUCTION
Plaintiff and appellant, Carl L. Barnum III, sued defendants and respondents,
Redlands Muffler and Brake (RMB) in Redlands and the Fred Edsell and Susan Edsell
1 Revocable Trust, the owners of the property on which RMB operates its business.
Barnum seeks statutory damages from defendants for multiple violations of the Unruh
Civil Rights Act (the UCRA) (Civ. Code, § 51 et seq.),1 plus attorney fees. Barnum, a
disabled person who holds a disabled parking space placard, alleges there were no
disabled parking spaces at RMB when he attempted to patronize the business on eight
occasions in March, April, and May 2011.
The court granted defendant’s motion for judgment on the pleadings on the ground
Barnum was judicially estopped from asserting his UCRA claims because he did not
disclose them as assets in his chapter 7 bankruptcy proceeding after the bankruptcy court
ordered the bankruptcy proceeding reopened.2 (Hamilton v. State Farm Fire & Cas. Co.
(9th Cir. 2001) 270 F.3d 778, 782-785 (Hamilton) [judicial estoppel bars bankrupt debtor
from later pursuing claims he did not disclose as assets in his bankruptcy proceeding].)