Lucero

Lucero v. County of Kern CA5

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaSeptember 3, 2014F066704California9,550 words

Opinion

Opinion

Kane, J.

Filed 9/3/14 Lucero v. County of Kern CA5

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

FLORENCIO LUCERO et al.,

F066704

Plaintiffs and Respondents, (Super. Ct. No. CV-273050) v.

COUNTY OF KERN et al., OPINION Defendants and Appellants.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Kern County. William D. Palmer, Judge. Theresa A. Goldner, County Counsel, Mark L. Nations and Andrew C. Thomson, Deputy County Counsel; Pollak, Vida & Fisher, Michael M. Pollak and Daniel P. Barer for Defendants and Appellants. Law Office of Michael J. Curls, Michael J. Curls and Nichelle D. Jones for Plaintiffs and Respondents. -ooOoo- On December 18, 2010, Jose Lucero ingested a large quantity of meth- amphetamine and began to engage in bizarre behaviors,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.