People v. Gartley CA4/3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaSeptember 5, 2014G049235California2,438 words

Opinion

Opinion

Rylaarsdam, J.

FACTS

On April 2, 2013, Orange County Deputy Sheriff Arthur Tiscareno stopped a car driven by defendant after noticing the vehicle’s registration tag had expired. Defendant appeared intoxicated. He agreed to a search of the car and Tiscareno found a vial under the floor mat that appeared to have spilled its contents. Using a narcotic identification kit, Tiscareno determined the substance to be Phencyclidine (PCP). Defendant was transported to a substation where Deputy Sheriff William Simandl, a certified drug recognition expert, evaluated him. Simandl concluded defendant was under the influence of a disassociate anesthetic, a category of drugs that includes PCP, and informed defendant he was under arrest and required to submit to a test of his blood. According to Simandl, when told he would have to submit to a blood draw defendant “made no response.” A licensed vocational nurse was called to obtain the blood sample. Upon her arrival, defendant was asked to sit down. He submitted to the blood draw without

2 resistance. Simandl testified that if defendant had refused the test, the back of an administrative form used by the sheriff’s department would have been completed. Defendant…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.