Clark Investment Company v. United States

Good Law
364 F.2d 7·1966 U.S. App. LEXIS 5410
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 21, 196619999California1,344 words

Opinion

Opinion

Duniway, J.

The National Housing Act, 12 U.S.C. § 1701 et seq., subch. VI, 12 U.S.C. §§ 1736 -1746a has, as one of its purposes, “to assist in relieving the acute shortage of housing * * * accommodations available to veterans of World War II at prices within their reasonable ability to pay * * 12 U.S.C. § 1738 (a). It authorizes the Federal Housing Administration to insure mortgages given as security for loans made to persons who propose to create such housing. This case involves a loan so secured and insured under 12 U.S.C. § 1743 .

Pocatello Heights Corporation is the mortgagor; First Security Bank of Idaho is the insured mortgagee; the property is located in Idaho. The mortgage insurance was obtained pursuant to detailed regulations promulgated under the authority of the Act, 12 U.S.C. § 1742 . See 24 C.F.R. (1947 Supp.) §§ 580.1-580.37. They were followed here, and the printed forms prescribed by F.H. A. and the regulations were used. The Act gives the mortgagee, if there is a default, the option to assign the mortgage to F.H.A. or to obtain title to the mortgaged property and convey it to F.H.A. 12 U.S.C. § 1743 (c). There was a default here, and the mortgagee bank chose the first…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.