Robert E. Rutherford v. United States

Good Law
365 F.2d 353·1966 Trade Cas. (CCH) 71,859·1966 U.S. App. LEXIS 5207
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 11, 196620377_1California2,534 words

Opinion

Opinion

Hamley, J.

In this proceeding Robert E. Rutherford was adjudged to be in contempt of court, and sentenced to imprisonment, for refusing to testify by way of deposition in a pending civil suit. Rutherford appeals, asserting that he was justified in declining to testify on his claim of privilege under the Fifth Amendment. We affirm.

Rutherford is an employee of Carnation Company of Washington (Carnation), a distributor of milk and milk products. In March, 1962, he was called to testify before a United States grand jury in connection with an investigation of antitrust law violations. He refused to waive immunity and was required to testify.

The grand jury returned an indictment charging Carnation, Inland Empire Dairy Association (Inland), and an official of Inland, with a conspiracy in violation of the Sherman Act in the sale of milk and milk products to Fairchild Air Force Base in Washington. All of the defendants were convicted and fined upon their pleas of nolo contendere.

Shortly thereafter, the United States commenced a civil suit against Carnation and Inland in the same district court to recover damages in connection with the same conspiracy. The complaint contains two counts. One of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.