Rominger

Rominger v. County of Colusa

Caution
177 Cal. Rptr. 3d 677·2014 Cal. App. LEXIS 813·229 Cal. App. 4th 690
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaSeptember 9, 2014C073815California15,357 words

Opinion

Opinion

Robie, J.

In this mandamus action under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA; Pub. Resources Code, § 21000 et seq.), plaintiffs Elaine and Gerald Rominger challenged a mitigated negative declaration approved by defendant Colusa County with respect to a subdivision proposed by real party in interest Adams Group Inc. The trial court denied the Romingers’ petition based on the conclusion that, notwithstanding the county’s approval of a mitigated negative declaration, the county’s “action in approving the subdivision map was not a project for CEQA purposes and [thus] no review beyond the preliminary review stage was required.”

On the Romingers’ appeal, we conclude the trial court erred in determining the proposed subdivision was not a CEQA project, even though the proposal did not include any specific plans for development. On our independent review of the Romingers’ other complaints, however, we find merit in only one. Specifically, we conclude that the Romingers adequately showed there is substantial evidence in the record that the subdivision may have a significant unmitigated impact on traffic at a particular intersection adjacent to the project site. Accordingly, on…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.