Logging Co. v. Barker

Good Law
366 F.2d 617·10 Fed. R. Serv. 2d 119·1966 Trade Cas. (CCH) 71,886·1966 U.S. App. LEXIS 5115
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 24, 196619896California6,184 words

Opinion

Opinion

366 F.2d 617 S & S LOGGING CO., Inc., Appellant, v. B. G. BARKER and Jane Doe Barker, his wife, Bob Jones and Jane Doe Jones, his wife, Ivan O. Jones and Jane Doe Jones, his wife, Harold C. Chriswell and Iris E. Chriswell, his wife, Wm. O. Benecke and Ruth Benecke, his wife, Summit Timber Company, a Washington corporation, and Eclipse Timber Co., a Washington corporation, Defendants, Lewis Hovde and Jane Doe Hovde, his wife, and the Bank of Sumas, a banking corporation, Additional Defendants, (Harold C. Chriswell et ux. and Wm. O. Benecke et ux. of Defendants), Appellees. No. 19896. United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit. Aug. 24, 1966. Joseph T. Pemberton, Bellingham, Wash., for appellant. John W. Douglas, Asst. Atty. Gen., Alan S. Rosenthal, Edward Berlin, Attys., Dept. of Justice, washington, D.C., Wm. N. Goodwin, U.S. Atty., Seattle, Wash., for appellees. Before POPE, BARNES and MERRILL, Circuit Judges. POPE, Circuit Judge. 1 Appellant brought suit against appellees and others under section 4 of the Clayton Act, 38 Stat. 731 (1914), 15 U.S.C. Sec. 15 (1964), charging a conspiracy to monopolize and control the sale of National Forest Service timber in Mount Baker…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.