Montana Environmental Information Center v. Stone-Manning

Good Law
766 F.3d 1184·2014 WL 4455002·44 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 20204·79 ERC (BNA) 1690·2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 17631
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 11, 201413-35107California2,436 words

Opinion

Opinion

O'Scannlain, J.

We must decide whether a challenge to potential approval of a surface mining permit is ripe for judicial review.

I

Montana Environmental Information Center and Sierra Club (collectively, “MEIC”) sued Tracy Stone-Manning, the Director of the Montana Department of Environmental Quality, in her official capacity. MEIC claims that Stone-Manning will violate duties imposed by the Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act (“SMCRA”), 30 U.S.C. §§ 1201-1328 , by approving a pending application for Area B of the Rosebud Mine. Invoking the statute’s citizen-suit provision, 30 U.S.C. § 1270 (a)(2), MEIC asked for declaratory and injunctive relief.

A

SMCRA establishes a “cooperative federalism” regime for mining regulation. See Hodel v. Va. Surface Mining & Reclamation Ass’n, 452 U.S. 264, 289 , 101 S.Ct. 2352 , 69 L.Ed.2d 1 (1981). Under SMCRA, Congress “offer[s] States the choice of regulating ... according to federal standards or having state law preempted by federal regulation.” New York v. United States, 505 U.S. 144, 167 , 112 S.Ct. 2408 , 120 L.Ed.2d 120 (1992) (citing Hodel, 452 U.S. at 288 , 101 S.Ct. 2352 ); see also 30 U.S.C. § 1253 .

Montana adopted a regulatory…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.