People v. Gerlach CA4/1

FACTS

On August 22, 2006, Gerlach unlawfully and falsely personated Edward Gerlach

in a manner in which he could have become subject to a suit and/or incur a charge.

DISCUSSION

Appointed appellate counsel has filed a brief summarizing the proceedings below.

Counsel presents no argument for reversal, but asks this court to review the record for

error as mandated by People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436 and Anders v. California

(1967) 386 U.S. 738. Counsel has identified no arguable issues.

We granted Gerlach permission to file a supplemental brief on his own behalf, but

he has not responded. A review of the record pursuant to People v. Wende, supra, 25

Cal.3d 436 and Anders v. California, supra, 386 U.S. 738 has disclosed no reasonably

arguable appellate issues. Gerlach has been competently represented by counsel on this

appeal.

2

DISPOSITION

The judgment is affirmed.

McDONALD, J.

WE CONCUR:

HUFFMAN, Acting P. J.

IRION, J.

3