S.A.

S.A. v. Maiden

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaSeptember 11, 2014D064097MCalifornia5,643 words

Opinion

Opinion

Mcdonald, J.

Filed 9/11/14 unmodfied opinion attached

COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION ONE

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

S.A., D064097

Plaintiff and Appellant,

v. (Super. Ct. No. 37-2012-00098497-CU-PO-CTL) JAN MAIDEN et al.,

ORDER MODIFYING OPINION

Defendants and Respondents. AND DENYING REHEARING

THE COURT:

The opinion filed on August 21, 2014, is modified to add the following footnote at

the end of the heading "FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND":

"The facts set forth in this opinion are based on N.A.'s declaration in support of

her anti-SLAPP motion to strike S.A.'s complaint against her."

The pre-existing footnotes are renumbered accordingly.

There is no change in the judgment.

The petition for rehearing is denied.

McCONNELL, P. J.

Copies to: All parties Filed 8/21/14 Unmodified version

CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION

COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION ONE

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

S.A., D064097

Plaintiff and Appellant,

v. (Super. Ct. No.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.