United States v. Danilo Banos-Mejia
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 16, 201411-10483California1,155 words
Opinion
Opinion
FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS SEP 16 2014
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 11-10483
Plaintiff - Appellee, D.C. No. 4:11-cr-01229-DCB-
JCG-
v. District of Arizona, Tucson
DANILO BANOS-MEJIA,
Defendant - Appellant. ORDER
Before: NOONAN, FISHER, and NGUYEN, Circuit Judges.
Danilo Banos-Mejia’s motion to recall the mandate is granted in light of our
recent decision in U.S. v. Gomez, —F.3d—, 2014 WL 1623725 (9th Cir. Apr. 24,
2014), which held that the generic definition of “statutory rape” includes a
four-year age differential as an element of the offense. Id. at *17.
The memorandum disposition filed on August 28, 2013 is withdrawn and a
memorandum disposition is filed concurrently with this order. Banos’s motion for
leave to file an untimely petition for rehearing en banc is denied as moot.