Bleau Fox v. Rabadi CA2/7

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaSeptember 16, 2014B249499California3,660 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 9/16/14 Bleau Fox v. Rabadi CA2/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION SEVEN

BLEAU FOX, B249499

Plaintiff and Respondent, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. BC490047) v.

AHED RABADI et al.,

Defendants and Appellants.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Holly E. Kendig, Judge. Affirmed. Law Offices of Kamal A. Bilal and Kamal A. Bilal for Defendants and Appellants. Bleau Fox, Thomas P. Bleau and Martin Fox for Plaintiff and Respondent. ___________________________ The trial court entered a default judgment pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure 1 section 585 for more than $100,000 in unpaid legal fees in favor of Bleau, Fox, a P.L.C., against its former client…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.