People v. Francisco CA4/1
Opinion
Irion, J.
DISCUSSION
Appointed appellate counsel has filed a brief summarizing the facts and
proceedings in the trial court. Counsel presented no argument for reversal but invited this
court to review the record for error in accordance with Wende, supra, 25 Cal.3d 436.
Pursuant to Anders, supra, 386 U.S. 738, counsel identified as a possible but not arguable
issue whether counts 1 through 14 were barred by the statue of limitations.
After we received counsel's brief, we gave Francisco an opportunity to file a
supplemental brief, but Francisco did not respond.
A review of the record pursuant to Wende, supra, 25 Cal.3d 436, and Anders,
supra, 386 U.S. 738, including the issue suggested by counsel, has disclosed no
reasonably arguable appellate issue. Francisco has been adequately represented by
counsel on this appeal.
DISPOSITION
The judgment is affirmed.
IRION, J.
WE CONCUR:
BENKE, Acting P. J.
NARES, J.
3