People v. Francisco CA4/1

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaSeptember 17, 2014D064818California135 words

Opinion

Irion, J.

DISCUSSION

Appointed appellate counsel has filed a brief summarizing the facts and

proceedings in the trial court. Counsel presented no argument for reversal but invited this

court to review the record for error in accordance with Wende, supra, 25 Cal.3d 436.

Pursuant to Anders, supra, 386 U.S. 738, counsel identified as a possible but not arguable

issue whether counts 1 through 14 were barred by the statue of limitations.

After we received counsel's brief, we gave Francisco an opportunity to file a

supplemental brief, but Francisco did not respond.

A review of the record pursuant to Wende, supra, 25 Cal.3d 436, and Anders,

supra, 386 U.S. 738, including the issue suggested by counsel, has disclosed no

reasonably arguable appellate issue. Francisco has been adequately represented by

counsel on this appeal.

DISPOSITION

The judgment is affirmed.

IRION, J.

WE CONCUR:

BENKE, Acting P. J.

NARES, J.

3