In re K.G. CA4/1

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaSeptember 17, 2014D066010California1,207 words

Opinion

Opinion

Mcintyre, J.

DISCUSSION

Parental rights may be terminated if there is clear and convincing evidence of

adoptability (§ 366.26, subd. (c)(1)); however, an exception exists where a parent has

"maintained regular visitation and contact with the child and the child would benefit from

continuing the relationship." (§ 366.26, subd. (c)(1)(B)(i).) A beneficial relationship is

one that promotes the well-being of the child to such a degree as to outweigh the well-

being the child would gain in a permanent home with adoptive parents. (In re Autumn H.

(1994) 27 Cal.App.4th 567, 575.) The parent must show that the parent-child

relationship is such that the child will be greatly harmed by the termination of parental

rights, so that the presumption in favor of adoption is overcome. (In re Brittany C.

(1999) 76 Cal.App.4th 847, 853-854.)

Implicit in this standard is that "a parental relationship is necessary for the

exception to apply, not merely a friendly or familiar one." (In re Jasmine D. (2000)

78 Cal.App.4th 1339, 1350.) The existence of this relationship is determined by taking

into consideration "[t]he age of the child, the portion of the child's life spent in the

parent's…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.