People v. Chaides

Good Law
177 Cal. Rptr. 3d 866·2014 Cal. App. LEXIS 847·229 Cal. App. 4th 1157
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaSeptember 17, 2014E059517California2,448 words

Opinion

Opinion

Richli, J.

The complaint in this case alleged that defendant Ricardo Alonso Chaides had a prior felony conviction under Penal Code former section 12025, subdivision (b)(3) and that this conviction constituted a strike for purposes of the three strikes law.

Penal Code former section 12025, subdivision (b)(3) elevates the offense of carrying a concealed firearm (Pen. Code, former § 12025, subd. (a)), which would otherwise be a misdemeanor, to a felony when the defendant has also committed active gang participation in violation of Penal Code section 186.22, subdivision (a). Active gang participation is a “wobbler,” i.e., it can be punished as a felony or as a misdemeanor.

One of the ways a prior conviction can qualify as a strike is if it is a conviction for a “felony offense, which would also constitute a felony violation of Section 186.22.” (Pen. Code, § 1192.7, subd. (c)(28), italics added; see id., § 667, subds. (d)(1), (e).)

The trial court sustained a demurrer to the strike prior allegation; it ruled that defendant’s prior conviction constituted only a misdemeanor violation of Penal Code section 186.22, subdivision (a).

The People appeal. We will hold that the trial court…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.