People v. Chambers CA3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaSeptember 18, 2014C075908California1,050 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 9/18/14 P. v. Chambers CA3

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT

(Sacramento)

THE PEOPLE, C075908

Plaintiff and Respondent, (Super. Ct. No. 13F04794)

v.

DUSHAWN JEROME CHAMBERS,

Defendant and Appellant.

Appointed counsel for defendant Dushawn Jerome Chambers asked this court to review the record to determine whether there are any arguable issues on appeal. (People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436.) Finding no errors, we affirm the judgment.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

We provide the following brief description of the facts and procedural history of the case. (See People v. Kelly (2006) 40 Cal.4th 106, 110, 124.) On July 26, 2013, Britney Williams, the owner of a 2012 silver Toyota Yaris with…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.