Williams v. Alden CA2/8

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaSeptember 18, 2014B249589California3,392 words

Opinion

Opinion

Flier, J.

Filed 9/18/14 Williams v. Alden CA2/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION EIGHT

HENRY WILLIAMS, B249589

Plaintiff, Cross-defendant and (Los Angeles County Respondent, Super. Ct. No. SC102466)

v.

NICK A. ALDEN,

Defendant, Cross-complainant and Appellant.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Gerald Rosenberg, Judge. Affirmed.

Nick A. Alden, in pro. per., for Defendant and Appellant.

Law Offices of Michael A. Lotta and Michael A. Lotta for Plaintiff and Respondent.

****** Defendant Nick A. Alden appeals an adverse judgment following a jury trial on plaintiff Henry Williams’s legal malpractice claims. Our review is…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.