People v. Woods CA2/4
Opinion
Opinion
Manella, J.
INTRODUCTION
Michael Oneal Woods appeals from the imposition of a probation revocation fine. He contends the fine was unauthorized, as the trial court failed to orally impose the fine following the probation revocation hearing. Finding no reversible error, we affirm.
FACTUAL BACKGROUND AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
On May 17, 2013, appellant entered a plea of nolo contendere to making 1 criminal threats, in violation of Penal Code section 422, subdivision (a). He also admitted a gang allegation. In exchange for the plea, the trial court imposed and suspended a seven-year prison term, and placed appellant on three years of formal probation. The court imposed a $280 restitution fine, and suspended a $280 probation revocation fine. The court noted that appellant “would not have to pay that fine unless you violate your probation.” On August 20, 2013, the People filed a motion requesting revocation of appellant’s probation. After a hearing, the court found appellant in violation and revoked his probation. The court imposed the previously suspended sentence of seven years in state prison. The court made no mention of any fines, and provided no reason for waiving or reducing any previously…