Pope

Pope v. Babick

Good Law
178 Cal. Rptr. 3d 42·2014 Cal. App. LEXIS 853·229 Cal. App. 4th 1238·14 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 11
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaSeptember 18, 2014G049629California5,085 words

Opinion

Opinion

Moore, J.

This case concerns a July 2008 motor vehicle accident on a freeway near Redlands. The vehicle occupied by plaintiffs Leo L. Pope and Judi Nightingale was hit by a vehicle driven by Debbie Sert, who is no longer a party. Plaintiffs proceeded to trial against Thomas Stanley, who they argued made a negligent lane change and caused Sert to hit plaintiffs’ car, and Matthew Babick, the vehicle’s owner. The jury found defendants not liable.

Plaintiffs offer two arguments on appeal. First, they assert there was not substantial evidence to support the verdict, a claim which we completely reject. Second, they argue the misconduct of Babick’s attorney, Gregory Kane, was so egregious the court should have granted plaintiffs’ request for a mistrial or motion for a new trial. Kane directly violated a court order by eliciting causation evidence from a California Highway Patrol officer who responded to the scene. Kane was subsequently sanctioned $500 and the jury was given a curative instruction. While we find Kane’s behavior unacceptable from an officer of the court, we do not find the single question and answer on this subject was so prejudicial as to warrant a mistrial or new trial.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.