Inland Western Temecula Commons v. Potter CA4/2

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaSeptember 18, 2014E057085California3,130 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 9/18/14 Inland Western Temecula Commons v. Potter CA4/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION TWO

INLAND WESTERN TEMECULA

COMMONS, LLC,

E057085

Plaintiff, Cross-defendant and Appellant, (Super.Ct.No. RIC1109914)

v. OPINION

SHERRY R. POTTER et al.,

Defendants, Cross-complainants and Respondents.

APPEAL from the Superior Court of Riverside County. Michael S. Hider, Judge.

(Retired judge of the Merced Super. Ct. assigned by the Chief Justice pursuant to art. VI,

§ 6 of the Cal. Const.) Affirmed.

Bewley, Lassleben & Miller, and Ernie Zachary Park for Plaintiff, Cross-

defendant and Appellant.

1 Reid & Hellyer, Michael G. Kerbs and Scott Talkov, for…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.