Veronica Ollier v. Sweetwater Union High School

Bad Law
768 F.3d 843·2014 WL 4654472·89 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 1292·95 Fed. R. Serv. 544·2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 18020
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 19, 201412-56348California11,047 words

Opinion

Opinion

Gould, J.

Defendants-Appellants Sweetwater Union High School District and eight of its administrators and board members (collectively “Sweetwater”) appeal the district court’s grant of declaratory and injunctive relief to Plaintiffs-Appellees Veronica Ollier, Naudia Rangel, Maritza Rangel, Amanda Hernandez, and Arianna Hernandez (collectively “Plaintiffs”) on Title IX claims alleging (1) unequal treatment and benefits in athletic programs; (2) unequal participation opportunities in athletic programs; and (3) retaliation. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , and we affirm.

I

On April 19, 2007, Plaintiffs filed a class action complaint against Sweetwater alleging unlawful sex discrimination under Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972 (“Title IX”), see 20 U.S.C. § 1681 et seq., and the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, see 42 U.S.C. § 1983 . They alleged that Sweetwater “intentionally discriminated” against female students at Castle Park High School (“Castle Park”) by “unlawfully failfing] to provide female student athletes equal treatment and benefits as compared to male athletes.” They said that female student athletes did not receive an “equal…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.