People v. Rojas CA4/1

STATEMENT OF FACTS

The plea to assault with a deadly weapon and the admission of the gang

enhancement was based on the testimony contained in the transcript of the preliminary

hearing.

DISCUSSION

As we have noted, appellate counsel has filed a brief pursuant to Wende, supra,

25 Cal.3d 436 indicating he has been unable to identify any reasonably arguable issue for

reversal on appeal. Counsel asks this court to review the record for error as required by

Wende. Pursuant to Anders, supra, 384 U.S. 738, counsel has identified the following

possible, but not reasonably arguable issue:

Was the defendant's guilty plea constitutionally valid?

2 We have reviewed the entire record with particular focus on the process

surrounding the guilty plea. We have not discovered any reasonably arguable issues for

reversal on appeal. Competent counsel has represented Rojas on this appeal.

DISPOSITION

The judgment is affirmed.

HUFFMAN, Acting P. J.

WE CONCUR:

AARON, J.

IRION, J.

3