United States v. John Apel

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 22, 201411-50003California430 words

Opinion

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 11-50003 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. v. 2:10-cr-00830-

JFW-

JOHN DENNIS APEL,

Defendant-Appellant.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 11-50004 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. v. 2:10-cr-00869-

JFW-

JOHN DENNIS APEL,

Defendant-Appellant.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 11-50005 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. v. 2:10-cr-00831-

JFW-

JOHN DENNIS APEL,

Defendant-Appellant. ORDER AND

AMENDED

OPINION On Remand From The United States Supreme Court

Filed August 14, 2014 Amended September 22, 2014

Before: Barry G. Silverman and Johnnie B. Rawlinson, Circuit Judges, and John R. Tunheim, District Judge.*

Per Curiam Opinion

COUNSEL

Erwin Chemerinsky, Selwyn Chu (argued) and Matthew Plunkett (argued), law students, University of California, Irvine School of Law, for Defendant-Appellant.

André Birotte Jr., United States Attorney, Robert E. Dugdale and Mark R. Yohalem (argued), Assistant United States Attorneys, Los Angeles, California, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

ORDER

Appellant John…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.