People v. Dillard CA3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaSeptember 22, 2014C075587California507 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 9/22/14 P. v. Dillard CA3

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT

(Tehama) ----

THE PEOPLE,

Plaintiff and Respondent, C075587

v. (Super. Ct. No. NCR87888)

EDWARD RAYMOND LEE DILLARD,

Defendant and Appellant.

Appointed counsel for defendant Edward Raymond Lee Dillard asked this court to review the record and determine whether there are any arguable issues on appeal. (People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436 (Wende).) Finding no arguable error that would result in a disposition more favorable to defendant, we will affirm the judgment.

1 I Because the matter was resolved by plea, the facts are taken from the probation officer’s report and the parties’ stipulation at the change of plea hearing. On March 2,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.