Franklin & Seidelmann v. Chao CA4/1

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaSeptember 22, 2014D065195California1,745 words

Opinion

Opinion

Irion, J.

Filed 9/22/14 Franklin & Seidelmann v. Chao CA4/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION ONE

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FRANKLIN & SEIDELMANN, INC., D065195

Plaintiff and Respondent,

v. (Super. Ct. No. 37-2012-00091628-

CU-BC-CTL)

DAVID J. CHAO et al.,

Defendants and Appellants.

APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of San Diego County, Richard E.L.

Strauss, Judge. Appeal dismissed.

Olins Riviere Coates & Bagula, Mark S. Bagula, Russell F.A. Riviere and Aminta

C. Raffalovich for Defendants and Appellants.

The Grant Law Firm, Miles D. Grant and Alexander J. Kessler for Plaintiff and

Respondent.

David J. Chao, M.D. (Dr. Chao), and David J. Chao, M.D., Inc. (Chao, Inc.)

(together, Defendants), attempt to appeal from an order…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.