Franklin & Seidelmann v. Chao CA4/1
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaSeptember 22, 2014D065195California1,745 words
Opinion
Opinion
Irion, J.
Filed 9/22/14 Franklin & Seidelmann v. Chao CA4/
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.
COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION ONE
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
FRANKLIN & SEIDELMANN, INC., D065195
Plaintiff and Respondent,
v. (Super. Ct. No. 37-2012-00091628-
CU-BC-CTL)
DAVID J. CHAO et al.,
Defendants and Appellants.
APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of San Diego County, Richard E.L.
Strauss, Judge. Appeal dismissed.
Olins Riviere Coates & Bagula, Mark S. Bagula, Russell F.A. Riviere and Aminta
C. Raffalovich for Defendants and Appellants.
The Grant Law Firm, Miles D. Grant and Alexander J. Kessler for Plaintiff and
Respondent.
David J. Chao, M.D. (Dr. Chao), and David J. Chao, M.D., Inc. (Chao, Inc.)
(together, Defendants), attempt to appeal from an order…