Studendorff

Studendorff v. National Semiconductor CA6

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaSeptember 25, 2014H037739California13,777 words

Opinion

Opinion

Grover, J.

Filed 9/25/14 Studendorff v. National Semiconductor CA6

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

CHRISTOPHER STUDENDORFF, et al., H037739 (Santa Clara County Plaintiffs and Appellants, Super. Ct. No. 110CV178254)

v.

NATIONAL SEMICONDUCTOR

CORPORATION,

Defendant and Respondent.

In this case, we consider questions regarding the statute of limitations for and delayed discovery of pre-birth injuries that were allegedly due to exposure to toxic and hazardous materials that occurred more than 20 years ago. Debbie Studendorff and her husband, Michael Studendorff, worked for defendant National Semiconductor Corporation (NSC) from the late 1970’s until the late 1980’s assembling semiconductor products. The plaintiffs are Debbie Studendorff and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.